Friday, September 19, 2014

Shaped Charges: Don't Believe Your Eyes

Shaped charges are explosive devices that contain a cavity - usually lined with metal - surrounded by explosives that take advantage of the Munroe Effect to focus the explosive energy on a target.  Shaped charges are used to cut metal, tap huge furnaces in steel mills, complete wells, initiate nuclear weapons, penetrate armor, and create art.  If you look at the end result of a shaped charge on a target, you may be led to believe that the charge melted its way through the target as illustrated here:


[1]
It looks as if the holes have been melted through the armor, but that is not the case.  Experiments have been done that measured the temperature of shaped charge jets.  Scientists found that the temperature of the liner material never even came close to the melting point of the material.  In that case, why do the targets look like they've been melted?  The velocity of the jet created by the shaped charge liner is typically between 3 and 20 km/s (6,700 - 45,000 mph).  When this hypervelocity liner jet hits a target, the force is so high that the jet and the target behave like fluids.  While the jet velocity is high, the two materials behave like a jet of liquid shot into a pool of water: the impact actually causes a "splash" in the target that is frozen as soon as the jet passes through.  While both materials are below their melting point, the forces involved are so high that they overcome the forces holding the solids in shape.  After the force is removed, the materials go back to behaving as they did before the impact.  The target looks like it was melted because it was flowing like a liquid even thought its temperature was below the melting point. Looks can be deceiving, but science reveals the truth.

For a more in-depth explanation of shaped charges and similar technology, you can download Introduction to Shaped Charges by William Walters.  

The Web is full of information and nifty graphics like this one of the development of a shaped charge jet:


[2]


Image Sources


Words Matter - Deflagrations, Detonations, and Conflagrations

To most people, terms like detonation, deflagration, and conflagration all mean about the same thing: something scary and energetic that blows something up or burns it down.  To an engineer concerned with protecting people, however, the differences are critical.  All three terms refer to the combustion of material but each term has a more specific definition that must be understood.

Of the three terms, conflagration has the least precise definition: it's simply a large, damaging fire.  Usually the term is used when describing huge fires that severely threaten property and/or life.  The term can be applied to structure fires, grass fires, or forest fires with equal abandon.  Many people would assume that the term is synonymous with deflagration, but that is not strictly true. 

A deflagration, on the other hand, is defined as an exothermic reaction (generally combustion)  progressing below the speed if sound in the unreacted medium.  A conflagration is a deflagration.  The two terms are used interchangeably by the public.  But a deflagration also includes explosions proceeding below the speed of sound.  The shock or blast wave that is produced may propagate  at sonic or even supersonic velocities but the reaction generating the blast is propagating below the speed of sound.  Most common vapor cloud explosions involving materials like propane, natural gas (largely methane), or gasoline vapors are deflagrations.  That doesn't mean that they are harmless by any means, but the overpressure produced by these events is general an order of magnitude less that of a detonation.

Which brings us to the final term: detonation.  A detonation is a reaction (generally combustion again) that proceeds at or above the speed of sound in the unreacted medium.  You can think of it as a coupled shock-flame system.  Rather than burning and pushing a blast wave out ahead of it like a deflagration, a detonation's combustion occurs immediately behind the shock wave it is generating.  Detonation explosions generate overpressure much, much higher than deflagration explosions.  High explosives detonate. Highly confined and/or very reactive gases can detonate as well..  Ethylene oxide or acetylene can detonate directly or undergo a deflagration to detonation transition where the flame front accelerates to the point that it catches the leading shock wave and couples to it. 

So why does it matter whether a system detonates or deflagrate?  One measure of the strength or damage potential of an explosive event is overpressure.  This is simply the pressure generated by the blast above the ambient atmospheric pressure. Overpressures of around 0.1 psig are sufficient to break windows.  One psig will damage a typical residential dwelling to the point it is no longer inhabitable.  At around 5.0 psig residential homes are completely destroyed.  Deflagrations can generate peak overpressures up to around 15-30 psig - more than sufficient to destroy buildings and kill people.  Detonations, on the other hand, generate overpressure of from 300 psig to several thousand psig so both types of explosions can ruin your day.  As one man once wrote, "A deflagration can rip the flesh from your bones but a detonation will pulverize the bones as well."  The difference may not matter to the victim of an explosion - the degree of "dead" doesn't really change the outcome.  For an engineer working to design buildings, bridges, or safety systems, on the other hand, the differences are critical.  To him, words really do matter.